Among the possible pieces of information to include on your resume, your bar admissions status (and/or USPTO admission status if you are a patent agent or IP attorney) is something you should absolutely include. At the most basic level, a law firm will always, without fail, want to know if you are licensed to practice in the state where you are applying for a lateral position. Since the question is going to be asked anyway, why not include it upfront (also, you don’t want to run the risk of not including it and having a hiring partner assume it is not there because you aren’t licensed and tossing your resume immediately in the reject pile).
- See 6 Things Attorneys and Law Students Need to Remove from Their Resumes ASAP If They Want to Get Jobs with the Most Prestigious Law Firms for more information.
In fact, as I have mentioned in previous articles, I work with a significant number of law firms in California who will not consider any lateral candidate who is not already licensed in California. There are a number of reasons for this, including but not limited to: 1) the firm does not want to pay the expense of bar exam fees, not to mention having an associate unavailable for a couple weeks post-hire in order to study for and take the exam; 2) for any litigators, you will not be able to represent clients in court without being locally licensed, and this creates logistical hassles for the partners; 3) becoming licensed locally is an indication you have seriously invested in the local legal market, and are more likely to stick around (this is especially true of lateral moves involving a change in geography); and 4) it looks better to the firm’s clients, and at the end of the day, everything comes down to the clients.