- Legal Recruiter ➝
- Law Firms ➝
- Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. - Employee Reviews
See reviews for Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. from attorneys and other legal professionals below.
BCG Attorney Search speaks with attorneys about law firms every day. Here is what attorneys are saying:
.Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym is a law firm that has been serving clients in Chicago and across the United States for more than 40 years. The firm provides a wide range of legal services, from commercial litigation to labor and employment law. The firm is well-known for its commitment to providing quality legal representation and excellent client service.
The reviews of Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym are overwhelmingly positive. Those who have worked at the firm remark positively on the congenial atmosphere, the interesting legal issues they are able to work on, and the manageable workload. They also report a good work-life balance and cite the firm�s commitment to their clients as a major reason why they enjoy working there.
However, there are some criticisms of the firm. Some reviewers have noted that the culture at Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym is a bit dry, and there are not many social events to meet other employees outside of your department. Additionally, salaries at the firm may be a bit lower than those paid by comparable firms.
Overall, Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym appears to be a good place to work, especially for those who are interested in commercial litigation and labor and employment law. The firm is well-respected in the legal community, and they are committed to providing excellent service to their clients. The work-life balance is also good, and the workload is manageable. However, those looking for a more social atmosphere may want to look elsewhere, and those looking for higher salaries may not find what they�re looking for at the firm.
"Professional Conduct Concern – Attorneys William Kalbac & John Wilson (Case No. 24-cv-2702)" - Anonymous
Advice to law firm management: A complaint has been lodged to ARDC and ISBA about lawyers from this firm
Pros: Willing to perform legal entrapment, break the law and commit perjury on behalf of their clients.
Cons: Title: Deep concerns about ethical conduct and possible legal entrapment
Review:
I was named in a federal lawsuit filed by this law firm on behalf of Grumpy Cat Ltd., claiming trademark infringement based on a design I uploaded to Redbubble. The image — a stylised, cartoon-like pattern I obtained from a licensed design platform — was titled ...Grumpy Cat Pattern.' It was never marketed as affiliated with the Grumpy Cat brand, nor did it resemble the company*s trademarked image in any significant way.
Here*s the troubling part: the design was online for years and had only one sale, which occurred immediately before the lawsuit was filed. This sale triggered the inclusion of my shop in a mass default action, leading to serious questions about whether the purchase was intentionally staged by or for the Plaintiff to create grounds for litigation — a classic sign of legal entrapment.
Despite being based overseas, I was never properly served or made aware of the lawsuit. My first communication from the attorneys came months after the case had already progressed in court, leaving me without a chance to defend myself. Emails I sent requesting clarification were ignored until I filed a formal response in court.
Even more troubling, funds were removed from my PayPal account without prior notice, and shortly after that, the attorneys contacted me to propose a ...settlement,' without disclosing the legal status of the case or any previous enforcement action already taken.
This approach — involving mass filings, lack of transparency, ignored communication, premature fund seizures, and vague settlement offers — raises very serious ethical and procedural concerns. I have submitted a formal complaint to the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission and believe this firm*s practices should be reviewed by legal and consumer watchdogs.
If you're a small business owner, creator, or international seller, be cautious. What happened to me could happen to anyone.
Partners to Avoid and Why: William B. Kalbac – [email protected]
John Wilson – [email protected]
Current or former employee?: Current Employee
Job type: Freelance
"The Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. received a favorable analysis from the source." - Anonymous
Pros: 4.0 Former EmployeePartner practicing in Corporate, Commercial, Real Estate, Employment, Construction, and Asset Management law ProsInteresting legal issues, congenial atmosphere, ok work life balanceConsSalaries, at least when I was there, a little under those paid by comparable firmsAdvice to ManagementLoosen up a little
Current or former employee?: Former Employee
Last Year at Employer: 2019
Job type: Full time
"I have a great view of the Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd., and I'm sure these reviews from other sources will only solidify that." - Anonymous
Pros: 5.0 Current Employee, more than 3 yearsGreat place, nice peopleMay 12, 2022 - Paralegal in Chicago, IL ProsNice people to work with, the workload is very manageableConsThe culture is a bit dry and there are not a lot of social events to meet other employees outside of your department
Current or former employee?: Former Employee
Last Year at Employer: 2022
Job type: Full time
Want to work at Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.?
The country's best legal placement firm may be able to get you there! Submit your resume to BCG Attorney Search today: CLICK HERE
